Council or Fire and Emergency? Where does the air quality responsibility lie?
2 weeks ago 52 JoshR

Council or Fire and emergency? Where does the air quality responsibility lie?

Fire and Emergency NZ (Fenz) presently can't seem to plug a hole over who should test for harmful smoke and caution general society.


Image: View of Auckland City when the fire at SkyCity broke out. Source:

The hole became visible in examinations concerning the SkyCity International Convention Center two years prior. Dark harmful smoke overwhelmed Central Auckland, shutting organizations, getting into cooling frameworks "causing wellbeing concerns and requiring the clearing of the SkyCity Hotel", the request a year prior found. 

"Numerous roads in Central Auckland were loaded up with thick smoke. "Various 111 calls revealed huge volumes of dark smoke." The request cautioned it stayed indistinct who should quantify air quality, and issue public alerts at any fire, huge or little. It proposed - in the eighth of its 10 proposals - that Fenz clear this up. 

Fenz said it was all the while dealing with it. "We have focused on our work and are at the arranging stage ... looking for affirmation from the government about obligation and responsibility for barometrical observing." Observing isn't one of its positions as spread out in law. Yet, FENZ said it managed jobs with general wellbeing units to guard individuals against smoke. 

The vulnerability caused a hole, the convention centre request said. "It was expressed to us that the neighbourhood chamber is answerable for observing air quality. "Despite that, the general population might have an assumption that the fire administration would have an agreement and enthusiasm for whether smoke being produced from a fire occurrence was harmful or not." 


Image: Auckland Council Central City Building. Source:

Fire groups must be ensured as well, it said. FENZ is getting air-filtering respirators yet they must be utilized when the smoke isn't awful to such an extent that it requests full breathing mechanical assembly. Since it would need to actually look at the air quality to decide this, maybe with handheld screens, "there might be a cooperative energy here with more extensive local area needs" - however, handheld screens were not reasonable for more broad barometrical checking, the request said. 

FENZ said firemen got full PPE and followed severe conventions and methods. "We work with general wellbeing units to accommodate public security from smoke at episodes by means of the suitable utilization of public wellbeing informing, cordons and rejection zones, cover set up requests and clearings." 

Concerning asbestos, another convention set up by WorkSafe required general wellbeing units to do air observing for it at a fire, in the event that they decided, Fenz said. "WorkSafe has educated us there are no assumptions about Fire and Emergency completing environmental checking at occurrences including asbestos." 


Image: FENZ attending SkyCity Convention Centre Fire. Source:

Asbestos was not a factor in the convention centre fire.

Who Do You think should be monitoring Air quality?

By using this site you agree to the use of Cookies, as described in our Cookie Policy.